Marks & Spencer overcharging women for larger bust size


Several years ago...

Beckie Williams, a 35-year-old children's author from Brighton, England, discovered that Marks & Spencer (Britain's number-one lingerie and fashion retailer) was overcharging women for a D cup bra by $4 compared to identical bras that were C or B cup.

Williams responded to this discrimination of busty women by launching a nationwide protest against what she calls "big boob injustice."

"We want good value big bras readily available, it's as simple as that," she says.

Along with a friend, Williams created the Facebook group "Busts 4 Justice" demanding equal pricing for larger bras. The Facebook group has since become a runaway support movement for large breasted women.

Marks & Spencer, responded initially that larger bras were a specialty item that demanded a higher price. The average bra size sold in Britain is 36C (although this could be because many women can't find a quality D cup bra). It also said its products are still cheaper than those of high-end retailers that cater to larger women.

Williams' take on the company's response: "They basically told us, `Tough titties, go away.'"

Ten years ago, the average bra size sold in the United Kingdom was 34B. Since 2003, the demand for bra sizes DD and bigger is up 30 per cent.

What Marks & Spencer apparently saw as only two women complaining has ballooned to more than 7,000 angry customers boycotting their large lingerie departments and a firestorm of publicity over the issue.

According to a retail survey Marks & Spencer sells half of all the underwear bought in Britain.

If bigger bras require more material and take more labour, Williams said, then similar pricing policies should be in place for all clothing, not just bras. Also, why are they overcharging bras for thin women with large breasts (ie. 34D), the same as overweight women with enormous breasts (ie. 40DD) which uses considerably more fabric?

"And women have big boobs even if they are not overweight. It is not something we have any say in," says Williams.

Other retailers have announced they are coming to the rescue, with the U.K. branch of La Senza telling customers they do not charge extra for bigger bras.

"At La Senza, our motto is `One price fits all,'" said Lisa Bond, the company's U.K. spokesperson. "We don't believe that just because you wear a bigger size bra, you should pay more for it."

The chain has even offered a 10 per cent discount to Busts 4 Justice supporters.

HOWEVER La Senza's Canadian operations does overcharge for bras in the D and DD range in Canada. La Senza representatives in Montreal had no comment.

So will the protest spread to Canadian women and demand equal pricing?

The History of the Bra

The History of the Bikini

The History of the Corset and Brassiere

Japanese Women Bust Out

Shock Absorbing Sports Bras

Preteen fashion bloggers?

As if we don't have enough lolitas in Hollywood now we also have to deal with lolita fashion bloggers...

12-year-old Tavi Gevinson posts fashion-inspired photos of herself on her blog "Style Rookie". She's part of a young generation of fashion bloggers who display pictures of their outfits for all the world to see.

"Lately I've been really interested in fashion, and I like to make binders and slide shows of `high-fashion' modelling and designs."

To many of us she's in a world where she doesn't belong. Privacy and predators are just two of the major reasons why we should be concerned, but also because the fashion industry's problems with anorexia, bulimia, drugs and self-abuse are well-documented and its not something children should be exposing themselves to at a young age.

The exposure concerns advocates like Parry Aftab, a lawyer who runs the online protection site WiredSafety.org. "Parents have no idea what their kids are doing online," Aftab says. "Most parents have no idea what a blog is."

Concerns about Internet safety for children have been fueled by such tragedies as the 2006 suicide of 13-year-old Megan Meier in Missouri. She hanged herself after receiving nasty online comments from a MySpace friend that turned out to be the fake creation of two acquaintances and a neighbour.

Although the United States federal government requires extra protection for Internet users who are younger than 13, not every website follows the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act. (And frankly why should they when book companies are publishing books by children on the same topics?)

Some young bloggers are taking their own steps to protect their privacy such as cropping their faces and keeping their identity a secret. Doing so is a safety necessity for the young bloggers because it's a chance to keep track of their obsession, with input from friends or other fashion fans.

Tavi's blog "Style Rookie" went from a non-issue to a problem when in late July, New York magazine's fashion blog questioned Tavi's age, dissecting her precocious fashion sense and sophisticated taste in music. The resulting comments ranged from suspicious to nasty, with one reader claiming, "Anyone who actually believes she is [really] 12 is an absolute idoit (sic)."

The Gevinsons were asleep at their vacation house in Michigan when Tavi checked her email and found the post.

The next night, "She woke up, and again woke us up, and said – and this is really heartbreaking – `I just woke up crying and I don't even know why I'm crying.'... She slept in the bed with us that night to get back to sleep," Gevinson says.

Such negative responses are another reason children should be hesitant about blogging. Children are very impressionable and the nasty responses they receive can be a major blow to their psyche.

But Gevinson thinks kids like Tavi are stronger than parents believe. "I have a lot of confidence in her and in most kids, if not all kids, that they can figure it out if they have good guidance and caring people working with them," he says.

Tavi, after taking a short break in the wake of the attention, has returned to blogging with her father's blessing.

"I'd much rather have her decide to stop if she's going to stop than to tell her to stop," Gevinson says. "She'll grow out of it – maybe, maybe not."

Fashion Vs Silly Gossip

FASHION - Why do fashion magazines often have gossip about celebrities in them?

To me it would make more sense (and appeal to more women's brains) if the magazines contained more feminism or politics. Issues that people can really talk about, discuss and try to change things to make the world a better place.

Gossiping about which celebrity is pregnant and who they are sleeping around with isn't going to change anything. That stuff never changes.

In other news I've noticed a lot more celebrities are now wearing cowboy hats casually... now if only we could get the politicians and feminists to wear more cowboy hats eh?

Just kidding, I know that will never happen.

But I do think there is some politicians and feminists who could use makeovers to make them look more professional.



There is this photo of Barack Obama, but he only did it for a photo shoot. He needs to be wearing his hat more often.


Diamond Skirt

I thought this diamond skirt was particularly awesome.

:)


Business Casual = Confusion

FASHION - Note to self... don't wear a hoodie to work, even if its "Casual Fridays".

The term "Business Casual" can be rather confusing... you can get away with small things. Little bits of casualness. Not too much however. No bikinis for obvious reasons.

Lets say you have a good understanding of your company's policy allowing business casual attire.

And then one day you get pulled her aside by one of the IT staff who then tells you it is inappropriate to wear Bermuda shorts, sleeveless tops and capris. Seriously, the nerd is telling the fashionista what she can and cannot wear... Has the world gone completely upside down???

Each generation seems to have a different idea of what is acceptable in the workplace... and in such a situation you can't help but be offended. Seriously. Capris! Get a life loser!

On one occasion I was actually not allowed to attend a meeting because my attire was deemed 'inappropriate.' People my age are taught to express themselves... but then when we enter the workforce we're supposed to shut up and do what we're told. We're told to follow our own initiative and think for ourselves, and then told to suddenly become brainwashed zombies... maybe our schooling system should be training sheep instead?

I mean let's say we go to a Toronto accountants school and we're taught to keep track of numbers on computers... sounds pretty dull right? So dull they could probably make a computer program that could track numbers and do accounting for us, erasing the need for accountants in the first place.

In which case we shouldn't need to dress like boring accountants, right? If we replace all the boring jobs with computer programs the only jobs left should be creative jobs, which implies workers should be encouraged to be more imaginative in terms of their artistic freedom.

Next: Are flip-flops appropriate business casual attire?

How about Crocs? (I'd argue Crocs are a fashion don't wherever you are!) They belong at home in your backyard, maybe the beach (if you don't care who sees them), or maybe in greenhouses or sunrooms. Any place you would normally wear sandals, but not necessarily want to be seen in them.

Anywho back to the office...

Business casual has become a staple of the office, but some idiotic companies are trying to enforce rules that set at least a minimum standard of dress (and this minimum is sometimes raised to gestapo like levels). These companies are increasingly enforcing more formal attire, despite calling it "business casual". Its become an oxymoron (smart idiot). Especially at meetings or on days when clients may visit the office, it reaches a point where you wonder what exactly is acceptable in terms of clothing (when in doubt, ask the HR rep, that way if someone asks or says your clothes are inappropriate you can pass the buck to the HR rep who said it was okay).

As summer heats up and fashion trends become even more laid back, employers are wrestling with how to adopt dress-code policies that encourage both productivity and professionalism... and I'd argue that if they really want to enforce gestapo black suits in the height of summer they had better have a good air conditioner in the building. Because if the AC is shoddy, don't expect people to wear thick clothing...

Business casual is a largely popularized topic in the dot-com crazed Silicon Valley. The argument has permeated the workplace, with 60% of employers allowing a dress-down day at least once a week, according to a 2006 survey by the Society for Human Resource Management.

And a backlash is brewing: The number of employers allowing casual dress days every day has plunged from 53% in 2002 to a new low of 38%. Eventually this has to reach a tipping point where people rebel against these often idiotic rules.

And what is even sillier is what is acceptable for "blue collar jobs". You know, work men. Construction workers, factory workers, and so forth. The type of people who fix Ottawa roofing, build decks, dig holes to put in pools, you get the idea. What is acceptable there is a t-shirt and blue jeans. Show up in something different and you will be open to ridicule by the manly men.

So this idea of appropriate work attire isn't limited to the office.

The reason for the return to more dressed-up attire is, in part, is because of the confusion generated by business casual standards. Companies will often lean towards the more gestapo-esque clothing rules when in doubt and then it just becomes a slippery slope.

Lets say for example that flip-flops aren't allowed. What about tennis shoes, jeans and shorts? Sleeveless dresses? T-shirts? Younger employees are more likely to push the envelope, which annoys more veteran workers who have long worked in offices where ties and shirts were expected no matter the day of the week. Such people resent younger workers breaking the rules they've become used to over decades being broken. Meanwhile employers resent becoming fashion police and having to solve disputes between generation gaps (and often managers are older themselves and thus err on the side of the older workers).

Are Casual Fridays getting out of hand?

"It started with casual Fridays and got out of hand," says June Webb, a fashion consultant in Alexandria, Virginia. "Now companies are starting to clamp down a little bit. They've found women have a tendency to show off too much skin, and men tend to show up in clothes that are wrinkled and not ironed."

Seriously. They want us to iron our clothes for "casual fridays"? I have never in my life ironed a pair of jeans.

Despite the push towards gestapo fashion, employer policies still run the gamut and often don't bother to write any official rules down, preferring to handle things on a case by case basis. I'd argue this is because it makes it easier for them to fire people on short notice for "inappropriate attire". An useful tool for bosses who want to fire people and are just waiting for an excuse. Show up wearing capris, get fired.

According to marketing firm McGrath/Power in Santa Clara, California they used to allow shorts, T-shirts and baseball caps on Casual Fridays. But now they require a more businesslike attire, with business casual including 'slacks and skirts'. Like its a school uniform at a prep school.

At McGrath/Power there have been situations where employees were asked to take off a baseball cap, leave on a sweater or not wear something again. With the third warning, employees are sent home to change.

"The pendulum has swung," says McGrath/Power CEO Jonathan Bloom. "We went through a too-casual period. … In the aftermath of the dot-com bubble, we tightened things up a little. When we were very casual, the quality of the work wasn't as good."

Bullshit. Nothing to do with the quality of the work. The economy prior to the dot com bubble bursting was skyrocketing. Unemployment was down. Job satisfaction was up. Companies were in the black (the red is the bad one, because that implies you are bleeding money).

Meanwhile in Auburn, New York, the city manager made headlines in April when he banned most city employees from wearing jeans on Fridays, a day that had long been reserved for casual attire. His office did not return calls seeking comment.

In contrast IBM has thrown out dress codes altogether. Once known as a traditional company of button-down shirts, cuff links and pinstriped suits, today it's an anything-goes approach. People just use common sense.

"As society has changed, so has IBM," says Donna Riley, the human resources vice president at IBM. "We do have a Birkenstock crowd in some of our locations. Many years ago, it was a suit and tie for men and skirt, dress and stockings for women. [Today's policy] says we trust our employees to use good judgment."

General Motors, where suits were once expected, now is also much more casual. Perhaps this is because the managers want to feel more relaxed around their blue collar employees. Not everyone gets away with this however. Employees representing GM to customers, suppliers and visitors are expected to dress consistently with the norms and expectations of the meeting or event, officials say. Business casual does not include athletic shoes, jeans, shorts, tank tops or sweatshirts.

Procter & Gamble also allows employees to dress more casually than in previous generations. Ford Motor Company has a casual business dress code, which is more laid back than 15 or 20 years ago.

"We ask them to use good judgment," says Marcey Evans, a Ford spokeswoman.

Imported Blog: Black Super Models

Hey folks!

I have just imported some older blog content from a different blog I run called Black Super Models. Most of the posts date back to 2007 and the reason behind the blog was to draw attention to the SHORTAGE of black supermodels. Sure there is a few out there, but I wanted to draw attention to the fact that there is no shortage of African models out there worthy of being paid more for what they do.

Amongst the posts imported are collections of photos of:

Tyra Banks and Naomi Campbell (obvious choices because they're more well known)

Tyson Beckford (a male supermodel you will probably recognize)

Ajuma Nasenyana (much less well known, but no less worthy)

See my post on Black Supermodels being Left Behind.

I will add more to this post later, I am off to the beach now...

Popular Posts

Search This Blog

Need to Advertise?

The FASHION SALON is accepting sponsors. Why? Because we're totally awesome and we can always use more shoes... and handbags... and shirts... jeans... you know, stuff!

Email suzannemacnevin{atsymbol}gmail.com and ask about our advertising and sponsorship rates.